Sports Cards Magazine & Price Guide had a great feature in the mid-’90s, providing “a wrapup of some of the country’s largest sports auctions.” This one from September 1996 was chockful of incredible items.
Larson highlighted the John F. Kennedy signed ball as the highlight of Mastro’s auction that topped $850,000 in sales. But I wanted to compare two of the cards to today’s prices. The PSA 8 graded 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle sold for $24,394; today, that’s probably a $1M card. And the PSA 8 1914 Crack Jack Joe Jackson, well, Heritage sold one nine years ago for $101k.
As for the rest of the article, half of that stuff won’t show up for sale again, but if any of it does, you can bet on it being a lot pricier!
Here’s another great mid-90s article from Sports Cards Magazine about the unopened collecting niche; this one from Doug Koztoski includes info from Mark Murphy, the Baseball Card Kid.
Here are a few key takeaways:
“For every pack that is opened from a particular year, all remaining packs are that much rarer.”
Doug interviewed Mark Murphy, the Baseball Card Kid, for insights; he was the Steve Hart (The Baseball Card Exchange) of the hobby then.
Murphy said that Wax was the pack of choice with unopened collectors; I think that’s still true.
At the time, a 1-cent 1933 Goudey Sports Kings pack was ~$600
The article highlighted that ’59 football penny packs were pretty common, but a penny pack from ’60 is tough to find.
A run of 1950s baseball nickel packs was estimated at $61,500 in the mid-’90s.
Fake packs were already very commonplace at the time.
Welcome to the Original Artwork Archive! This is the hub for all the articles I’ve written about original artwork used to produce cards, sorted by sport and set. A lot of these pieces originate from the Topps Archives and Guernsey’s Topps auction, while others remain “lost,” buried in private collections. But thanks to the hobby library, I can scan and share photos from these and other past auctions and magazines, preserving these treasures for collectors to enjoy.
If you have any examples to share, shoot me an e-mail.
Welcome to the Uncut Sheet Archive! This is the hub for all the articles I’ve written about uncut sheets, sorted by sport and set. My goal is for it to be the definitive source of uncut sheet information on the web, offering insights into distribution, production quirks, and the factors behind why some vintage cards were so condition-sensitive, even out of the pack!
If you have any rare sheets to share, shoot me an e-mail.
Welcome to the relaunched Unopened Archive! It used to have pages with photos of packs, wrappers, boxes, and cases from all the big pre- and post-war releases. This 2.0 version is more of a hub for all my blog posts about different unopened material. Over time, I’ll bring back the old content and add way more—like info about fakes, finds, sales, collation, and all the known products out there.
If you’re looking for a particular unopened product photo, shoot me an e-mail.
Topps did well with their first hockey card design in 1954; it’s perhaps their best-designed set across any sport. While the fronts of the cards are sharp, the backs may be the most underappreciated in the hobby. So, I wanted to spend this article dissecting Topps’ first hockey set, emphasizing the design of the backs, since I feel most of us tend to neglect to pay attention to the “other side” of cards these days.
The 60-card 1954 Topps hockey set featured players from the four American teams (Boston, Chicago, Detroit, and New York). The cards were the same “giant-size” Topps had released for baseball at the time, 2-5/8″ by 3-3/4″. While Topps licensed the cards, most hobbyists believe they were only released in Canada. The set’s key card is of the great Gordie Howe.
The cards came in one-cent and five-cent packs. Five-cent packs had six cards, gum, and an insert wrapper. Collectors could send off that second wrapper for prizes. One-cent packs had one card and a piece of gum.
The set wasn’t a huge success, perhaps because Topps released a set of U.S. teams mainly in Canada; collectors wouldn’t see another Topps hockey set until 1957.
The fronts’ design is genuinely awesome. They feature an oversized player photo on a white background, with red and blue colors along the bottom, highlighting the player’s name, position, and team. Plus, the facsimile autograph shows clearly against the background. But the backs of the cards shine, too.
Now, what makes a great card back? To me, it’s about design, color, and information, and Topps nailed all three here.
The design is clean. The card number is large, within a puck-like-shaped circle in the corner. The blue and red stripes highlight the player’s name, position, and team, similarly to the front’s design. Then you have the blue hockey stick separating the player’s vitals from their biography. The cartoon and generic hockey term/fact add some fun to the back, and the statistics from 1953 are an excellent, simple addition along the bottom.
The cards are All-American with white card stock and red and blue ink.
From an information standpoint, the only addition one could ask for (which would make the card too busy) would be career statistics. As it is, though, you can learn a lot about the player and hockey from these cards.
Topps left a fantastic first impression on hockey collectors with this beautifully designed set; the front and back have incredible eye appeal. There aren’t many sets that you can buy that would look as outstanding presented on a wall from either side as the 1954 Topps hockey set; happy collecting!
Mastro offered five scarce hockey wax packs in their August 2004 Sports Premier Catalog Auction. Here’s the oldest, from the 1954/55 Topps set featuring a “who’s who” of hockey greats: Kelly, Howe, Worsley, Bathgate, and Sawchuck!
Also included were a 1957/58 Topps Five-Cent Wax Pack, a 1958/59 Parkhurst 5-cent Wax Pack, a 1961/62 Topps Five-Cent Wax Pack, and a 1965/66 Topps Five-Cent Wax Pack.
For good measure, a 1954/55 Topps display box was also part of this catalog!
PS, this auction also included a few lots I’ve discussed previously: